
In the Knox article he argues that a series of distinctive new urban landscapes is emerging from a socio-spatial dialectic dominated by the effects of the reconfiguration of economic and cultural life in the DC area. He discusses that new urban landscapes provides conceptual and empirical issues in regards to social and cultural geography. Knox has an apparent problem with his examination of the urban landscapes in Washington because of the radically different form of ecology from that of the classic American city. The spacial patterns associated with the landscape elements described do not fit comfortably within designated sectors, zones and mosaic patterns.
Lastly Knox argues that fragmentation, multinodality, fluidity, plurality and diffusion prove DC to be a new breed of complex urbanism which is specialized by social districts, that have taken the place of the idea of the synoptic pattern.
This article made me reflect back on the teaching of urban societies by Jane Jacobs. Her view and strong critique on urban renewal policies are not quite disregarded, but pushed aside as DC is growing rapidly in infrastructure but not in people friendly areas. She would have said that DC contractors are destroying communities and are creating isolation amongst the people due to unnatural urban spaces. The one aspect that Jacobs would concur with would be the mixed-use of neighborhoods as we see much of that in the district.
The solution to Knox’s argument in my opinion is to reduce focus on building up and rather build across and accommodate the community in mix friendly habitat. DC is growing so rapidly it is so apparent that contractors must take a step back and reevaluate what is going to sustain the neighborhoods, not make it financially richer.